0

Review: Grover Notting Code 1.5 Nearfield Principal Monitors

With no ports, no built-in amplifiers and a preference for passive crossovers, Grover Notting takes studio monitoring into the future by delving into the past…

By

5 July 2011

When Frank Hinton of Grover Notting told me he was designing a series of principal studio monitors, I was outwardly encouraging but secretly cynical. It was September 2009 and Grover Notting had been enjoying some success with their CR series of cross-reference monitors [reviewed by Andy Stewart in Issue 65]. In fact, I’d recently bought myself a pair of CR1s after using them to cross-reference some recordings I’d done for a Josh Pyke DVD. I was impressed by their stereo imaging, their easy-going nature compared to the nagging NS10s that sat beside them, and by how well the results translated to the outside world. The CR series were successful because they filled the hole left in the market after Auratone’s 5C and Yamaha’s NS10 had faded into irrelevance. I could see no such hole in the principal monitor market, however, and felt that another series of principal monitors was precisely what the world didn’t need. I listened politely nonetheless, eyebrows raised to 50% in half interest, as Frank enthused over his forthcoming ‘Principal Monitor’ series.

“These new monitors build on the Audio Information Band concept we developed for the CR series,” Frank began. Grover Notting defines the ‘Audio Information Band’ as the extremes of the human vocal bandwidth, from 80Hz to 11kHz, and believes that a useful monitor must be able to reproduce that bandwidth with a linear amplitude and phase response. I raised my eyebrows to 60% out of respect for the CR series.

“All these new monitors use infinite baffle enclosures – no ports,” he declared. Interesting… I had always preferred the clearly defined low frequency performance of an infinite baffle enclosure to the more extended but woollier ‘thump factor’ provided by most of the ported enclosures that dominate the market. My eyebrows involuntarily notched up to 70%.

“There are no amplifiers bolted onto their backs,” Frank continued. Eyebrows to 80%. When active monitors first hit the market I loved the idea of integrating the amplifier into the speaker enclosure, but I had since grown to dislike the added weight and cabling. I yearned for the days when amplifiers lived in ventilated racks where they belonged, and monitors could be moved around without slipping a disc or popping a hernia.

“They’re all using passive crossovers designed by Dr Neville Thiele…” Eyebrows at 90%. Dr Neville Thiele is one of the world’s leading experts on the design of loudspeaker enclosures and filters. In 1961 he and Dr Richard H. Small published their famous paper, Loudspeakers in Vented Boxes, replacing all the guesswork of vented (i.e. ported) enclosure design with a methodical approach backed by solid mathematical formulae. The ‘Thiele/Small parameters’ are now a fundamental part of loudspeaker enclosure design.

Frank’s enthusiasm was contagious, but I still had doubts. How could an infinite baffle enclosure compete in a market dominated by ported enclosures that, on a size-for-size basis, produced more low frequency output? If only there was a way to combine the low frequency clarity of the infinite baffle enclosure with the extended bandwidth of a ported enclosure.

“They’re also the first loudspeakers in the world to use Graeme Huon’s patented Bandwidth Extension Module,” Frank concluded, clasping his hands. “Think of it as a passive electronic version of a port. It gives an infinite baffle enclosure the extended bandwidth of a ported enclosure, without any of the acoustical problems inherent in ports.” My eyebrows ran out of headroom at this point. By now Frank had my undivided attention, and I hope I’ve still got yours…

THE CODE 1.5, EVENTUALLY

Now in production, Grover Notting’s Principal Monitor series consists of six models intended for applications from desktop mixing to large scale mastering. Proudly designed and manufactured in Australia, the series represents a complete re-think of critical monitor design with no ports, no built-in amplifiers, no active crossovers [except for the models incorporating sub-bass drivers] and a strict adherence to the Audio Information Band concept. Every design decision was made to achieve the highest performance, rather than meeting a price point or following a market trend. They’re not cheap, but if you’re looking for a no-compromise studio monitor that was designed entirely in response to the needs of working audio professionals, you might find it in the Principal Monitor series.

The Code 1.5, reviewed here, is the smallest in the series. It’s a passive two-way system in an infinite baffle enclosure measuring 285mm x 175mm x 164mm and weighing a satisfying 6kg. Intended for use in desktop mixing and similar near-field applications, and as a portable monitor for location work, it offers a frequency response of 75Hz to 32kHz (–3dB), a sensitivity of 85dB SPL (1 watt @ 1m), and typically less than 0.2% THD in the mid-band.

The Code 1.5 uses a 149mm (a tick under six inches) mid/bass driver and a 26mm soft dome high frequency driver. The drivers are the heart of any studio monitor and these ones are worthy of their own reviews, but I don’t have the space for that here. You can read about them on Grover Notting’s website (www.classicaudiodesigns.com.au), and in the interview with Frank Hinton that accompanies this review on the AT website.

A passive fourth-order Linkwitz/Riley crossover, designed by Dr Neville Thiele, as mentioned earlier, provides the frequency division at a respectably high 2.5kHz. Finally, Graeme Huon’s Bandwidth Extension Module adds an extra half octave or so of low frequency performance while sharply filtering out any low frequencies that cannot be reproduced by the system, thereby easing the load on the mid/bass driver and the amplifier. Speaking of loads, the Code 1.5 has a nominal impedance of 8Ω.

NEED TO KNOW

  • PRICE

    Code 1.5: $2379 each

  • CONTACT

    Classic Audio Designs
    (03) 9379 5025
    [email protected]
    www.classicaudiodesigns.com.au

  • PROS

    • Highly accurate without sounding clinical
    • Tonal consistency and naturalness
    • Excellent low frequency resolution
    • Remarkable soundstaging
    • Solid construction
    • Designed, tested and manufactured in Australia

  • CONS

    • Low SPL capability and limited low frequency extension due to their small size
    • Passive design means the price does not include power amplifiers

  • SUMMARY

    The Code 1.5 is designed to meet a performance level dictated by audio practitioners, not a price point dictated by a marketing department. It’s fair to say that it is expensive, but not fair to say that it is too expensive for what it offers. Its small size dictates a limited SPL capability and reduced low frequency extension, but within those limitations it is uniquely accurate, natural and useful. It would be very difficult to find a monitor of similar size that offers equivalent performance.

CODE 1.5: WALKING THE SOUNDSTAGE

I spent many hours with a pair of Code 1.5s in numerous control rooms at the Australian Institute of Music, with the primary evaluation sessions being conducted over two five-hour periods on two consecutive days. The first was a listening session to establish what they were capable of. I was using Audiofile Engineering’s Fidelia software player through my MacBook Pro’s S/PDIF optical output into a Benchmark Media Systems DAC1 driving a Bryston 4B power amplifier. The test material ranged from 16-bit/44.1kHz wavs lifted from my CD collection to my 24-bit/96kHz field recordings from Asia.

I’ll start by saying that with a –3dB point of 75Hz, a sensitivity of 85dB SPL and a typical SPL capability of about 100dB SPL, you won’t be partying to the Code 1.5s. However, within their SPL and low frequency capabilities I cannot find anything to fault, nor to ask more of; there are no prominent peaks or dips, no nagging colourations, no power compression and none of the ‘small box’ effect I was expecting. The balance of parameters is, dare I say, perfect; the Code 1.5s offer one of the most accurate and rewarding listening experiences I’ve ever had. Instead of prattling on about their highly linear amplitude and phase responses, their unfatiguing low distortion and all the usual stuff you read in monitor reviews, I’m going to focus on the one telltale performance aspect that only works well when all of the other factors are taken care of: soundstaging, i.e. a sense of width and depth, along with clearly focused image location. For this, the Code 1.5s are truly remarkable. Close-miked popular music was revealed in all of its two-dimensional in-your-face glory; you could almost see the wall of sound confined between the monitors and extending back no more than 30cm or so behind the baffles. Meanwhile, all-tube direct-to-stereo acoustic recordings from Water Lily Acoustics and challenging solid-state acoustic recordings from ECM both created three-dimensional soundstages that extended beyond the monitors in all directions. I wanted to take a walk inside…

The quality of the low frequency reproduction is particularly unique for a monitor of this size. It drops off quite sharply and noticeably below 75Hz, but all the way down to that point it is as linear, detailed and controlled as I’ve heard through any monitor of any size. I attribute this to Graeme Huon’s innovative Bandwidth Extension Module. If my experiences with an early prototype version of the larger Code 4 are any indication, it’s safe to say that the larger models in the Principal Monitor series, with their extended low frequency responses, will perform even better.

With their infinite baffle designs, high quality passive crossovers, lack of built-in amplifiers and the Bandwidth Extension Module, Grover Notting has ignored every market trend and taken the design of studio monitors back to the drawing board

WALKING THE TALK

It’s one thing to listen to a pair of monitors, but quite another to work with them – that’s what the second evaluation session was for. I used the same monitoring path but ran some troublesome mixes of my own from within Apple’s Logic Pro. These mixes had been done on a range of active two-way nearfield monitors in ported enclosures from Genelec, Dynaudio, Mackie and similar; some of them I had re-visited and tweaked on numerous occasions. I knew they weren’t right but could never put my finger on the cause of the problems. The Code 1.5s laid those problems out in front of me as if they were the most obvious things in the world. Panning, equalisation, dynamic processing and reverberation problems were a cinch to identify and fix. Many of the problems were due to subtle low frequency masking that the ported monitors I’d previously mixed on could not reveal due to their imprecise low frequency behaviour, but which the Code 1.5’s infinite baffle enclosure and Bandwidth Extension Module reproduced cleanly and in perspective.

The combination of low frequency resolution and remarkable soundstaging made the Code 1.5s a pleasure to work with. The speed and confidence with which I was able to isolate and remedy mix problems should not be undervalued, as anyone working professionally will readily appreciate.

TONAL UNIFICATION

After spending the last two decades being force-fed the benefits of active designs, I am still finding it hard to accept that the Code 1.5 is a passive design. It is clear to me that Dr Neville Thiele’s passive crossover is at least the equal of the best active designs, possibly superior, and may be the catalyst for my next observation.

There is a ‘naturalness’ and tonal consistency in the Code 1.5 that I cannot remember hearing in any active monitor – and I’ve heard quite a few. I suspect this tonal consistency is because the entire bandwidth of the signal is passing through a single power amplifier before being filtered and applied to the drivers, and therefore has the tonal character of a single power amplifier embedded into it. In comparison, an active monitor filters the signal first and passes each filtered bandwidth through a separate power amplifier (each optimised for the bandwidth it is amplifying, and therefore each is different) before reaching the drivers, resulting in a different tonal character being embedded into each bandwidth. I believe that explains what I have heard in most active systems; they are capable of excellent clarity and detail, but there is always a tonal disconnect between the different bandwidths that ultimately leads to adjectives such as ‘electronic’, ‘clinical’ and ‘surgical’. The Code 1.5 has none of that disconnect; it offers remarkable clarity and detail while remaining tonally unified.

NOT SO BAFFLING

With their infinite baffle designs, high quality passive crossovers, lack of built-in amplifiers and the Bandwidth Extension Module, Grover Notting has ignored every market trend and taken the design of studio monitors back to the drawing board. As a result, it’s produced a series of superbly accurate and useable studio monitors that make their active and ported competitors look more concerned with meeting the needs of the marketing department than the needs of the market itself.

The Code 1.5 is the smallest member of the Principal Monitor series, and is without peer for its size. I cannot think of a monitor of superior adeptness at any size, assuming a level playing field with the source material and playback conditions kept within the Code 1.5’s SPL and low frequency capabilities. Many users will find it hard to justify the price for such a small monitor – especially those working in genres that consistently contain information below 75Hz, and who would be better served by the larger Code 4 and Code 5 models. If, however, you need uncompromising sound quality from a very small enclosure, you’ll have a hard time finding anything superior to the Code 1.5. It’s bound to raise a few eyebrows…

EXTRA TECHNICAL

Further information related to this review, including an interview with Grover Notting’s founder Frank Hinton about the development of the Principal Monitor series, plus commentary by Dr Neville Thiele and Graeme Huon about loudspeaker enclosures, filter design and the Bandwidth Extension Module, can be found on the AT website.

RESPONSES

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More for you

Filter by
Post Page
Reviews Sennheiser Audio interface Universal Audio RØDE Preamps & Channel Strips SSL Issue 97 Audient Moog Shure Kali Audio Arturia Issue 96 Hotone
Sort by